Bees for Development respects your right to privacy so the only web cookies this website deploys are those which are strictly necessary for its correct operation and which enhance the experience of our site visitors – no personally identifiable information is collected. If you continue to browse our website we will assume that you are happy with our policy and to receive cookies from our website. If you choose to follow a link to third-party website please be aware that other organisations may have different cookie deployment policies from our own. You can change your cookie preferences in your web browser at any time.
The specialist international beekeeping organisation
Bees for Development BfD Journal 102 5 Text on this website
Stakeholders share hive technology experiences Biryomumaisho Dickson Executive Director TUNADO PO Box 11804 Kampala UgandaKey words:? frame hive local-style hive top-bar hive UgandaIn February 2012 a meeting was held in Fortportal Town Rwenzori Uganda to provide opportunities for representatives from stakeholder organisations to hear farmers' experiences in using different styles of hive and to discuss ways forward.? Later The Uganda National Apiculture Development Organisation TUNADO presented its draft strategic plan for discussion and input.Mr Kazahura Felix of SNV Netherlands Development Organization Rwenzori reported that his organisation has been working with different honey sector actors to ensure an increase in honey productivity through establishing famer led extension systems with model apiaries working as demonstration sites. The challenge has been the low volume of production compared to estimates of the sector's potential below. Could the style of hive being promoted affect the sector's ability to reach its potential?Honey production - actual vs potential Uganda apiculture sector profile 2010 Current annual honey production = ? ? ? ? 2 600 T Potential annual honey production =? 500 000 T The price for honey in Uganda is higher than in the UKTypes of hives Mr Tunanukye George of of Kamwenge Beekeepers Co-operative Society KABECOS said that developers have sidelined local-style traditional hives and are promoting frame hives and top-bar hives.? According to books using frame hives provides a good harvest with high quality honey. However in reality frame hives have several disadvantages:? most hive makers make hives that are poor or sub-standard which make it impossible for colonisation and honey production. Frame hives need specialist expertise to manufacture compared with local-style hives and the technology is too expensive for many farmers.Beekeepers gave testimony that high absconding rates meant frame hives were very expensive for the amount of honey they produced but that they are happy with the return on local-style and top-bar hives.Hives Save Lives reported that of all the farmers they supplied with frame hives on credit only 2% have paid back and that for those supplied with top-bar hives all of them have paid back.Mr Magezi Eliezer of Bunyangabo Beekeepers Co-operative BBC said that promoting top-bar and local-style hives in his organisation gave good results and in the last seven years BBC had not run out of honey in accordance to demand. Another reason for promoting local-style hives is the harvest of propolis which attracts a good price sometimes more than honey.The 1 Million investment Hive costs and production figures from farmers were used to analyse the profitability of UGX1 million if invested in any of the existing hive types as shown in the table below.Hive type? Cost per hive UGX? Number of hives? Colonised hives 0%*? Honey per colonised hive kg? Honey produced kg? Income UGXFrame? 150 000? 7? 2? 30? 60.3? 301 500 Top-bar? 50 000? 20? 6? 24? 144.0? 720 000 Local-style? 5 000? 200? 60? 10? 600.0? 3 million [itals]UGX2 500 = US$1 0.75 March 2012[end] * High absconding and other factors mean relatively low colonisation rates are assumed.Mr Ahimbisibwe Patrick from Hives Save Lives agreed that to make a frame hive costs UGX150 000 US$60; 45 compared with a top-bar hive UGX50 000; US$20; 15 or local-style? hive UGX5 000; US$2; 1.5. However in his experience average production from all types of hive is about the same and lower than the above estimates at 10 kg. He concluded that promoters should focus on local-style hives since the benefits are equal and the costs far lower and leave top-bar and frame hives to those who can afford them. Recommendation the use of local-style hives should be encouraged with regular monitoring to increase productivity.It was concluded that further scrutiny and research is necessary to provide good information on the direction of investment on hive technology for upscaling production.TUNADO's philosophy is that "We believe in promoting apiculture as a business enterprise." The organisation is committed to the financial as well as the environmental sustainability of the apiculture sector. In contributions to its draft strategic plan Mr Tunanukye George recommended that TUNADO:
? lobby for government payment for the National Residual Monitoring Plan in line with the EU market requirements.? Participating organisations Alpine Bees for Development Bunyangabo Beekeepers Co-operative Effective Skills Development Consultants Hives Saves Lives Kabarole Beekeepers Association Kabarole District Local Government/National Agricultural Advisory Services Kamwenge Beekeepers Co-operative Society Kasaba Group Private Sector representatives SNV Netherlands Development Organization The Uganda National Apiculture Development Organisation TUNADO?